Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for Koha

Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2024 results according to the type and size of the library.

2024 Koha Responses by Sector
KohaallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS1357.67 327.4777.292347.68117.91035
ILSFunctionality1357.60 327.4177.292347.50117.73035
PrintFunctionality1347.99 327.9478.002337.88118.09035
ElectronicFunctionality1256.44 316.1375.001336.64116.55034
SatisfactionCustomerSupport1307.81 317.8776.431347.85117.55035
CompanyLoyalty1307.78 328.0376.141337.52118.00035



2024 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction135 2 1 1 4 5 34 55 33 87.678
ILS Functionality135 2 1 1 3 11 32 55 30 87.608
Print Functionality134 1 1 2 7 23 48 52 97.998
Electronic Functionality125 4 1 3 5 7 16 11 32 29 17 76.447
Company Satisfaction130 3 1 1 3 9 20 38 55 97.858
Support Satisfaction130 1 2 1 3 2 10 17 39 55 97.818
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty130 2 1 4 6 9 13 31 64 97.788
Open Source Interest110 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 13 22 98.8510

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS138 85.80%
Considering new Interface138 128.70%
System Installed on time?138 00.00%

Average Collection size: 218674

TypeCount
Public48
Academic43
School3
Consortium5
Special9

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0001
[3] 100,001-250,0004
[4] 250,001-1,000,0004
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2023 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction211 1 1 4 3 3 9 42 87 61 87.758
ILS Functionality209 2 2 1 5 1 14 52 81 51 87.608
Print Functionality208 3 1 1 2 7 3 29 85 77 87.898
Electronic Functionality198 8 4 4 9 8 22 29 40 47 27 86.337
Company Satisfaction208 2 5 5 10 30 67 89 97.968
Support Satisfaction205 2 3 3 10 10 29 58 90 97.868
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty203 2 1 1 4 8 9 29 55 94 97.908
Open Source Interest129 9 5 3 1 7 2 5 13 25 97.9410

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS217 115.07%
Considering new Interface217 188.29%
System Installed on time?217 00.00%

Average Collection size: 173820

TypeCount
Public101
Academic46
School3
Consortium6
Special9

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0002
[2] 10,001-100,0008
[3] 100,001-250,0003
[4] 250,001-1,000,0004
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2022 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction220 1 1 3 2 13 44 86 70 87.848
ILS Functionality219 1 2 2 4 16 47 88 59 87.748
Print Functionality217 1 1 3 2 2 7 36 88 77 87.938
Electronic Functionality204 4 2 6 9 11 25 32 45 37 33 76.427
Company Satisfaction209 1 1 4 3 2 10 32 59 97 97.978
Support Satisfaction212 1 3 2 4 9 36 56 101 97.988
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty209 3 4 3 2 1 7 7 23 49 110 97.859
Open Source Interest141 13 2 1 1 1 5 3 8 7 37 98.0110

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS227 125.29%
Considering new Interface227 146.17%
System Installed on time?227 00.00%

Average Collection size: 194101

TypeCount
Public85
Academic64
School8
Consortium6
Special17

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0003
[2] 10,001-100,00012
[3] 100,001-250,0005
[4] 250,001-1,000,0006
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2021 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction212 1 2 2 5 56 89 57 87.858
ILS Functionality212 1 2 1 5 11 62 82 48 87.668
Print Functionality210 1 1 2 1 8 28 89 80 88.068
Electronic Functionality202 8 3 6 6 6 25 30 46 41 31 76.397
Company Satisfaction208 2 3 1 6 6 28 75 87 97.998
Support Satisfaction205 1 3 1 7 5 43 56 89 97.958
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty205 2 1 2 3 2 8 1 32 62 92 97.888
Open Source Interest119 9 1 2 1 2 3 8 36 98.4110

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS217 73.23%
Considering new Interface217 177.83%
System Installed on time?217 00.00%

Average Collection size: 251749

TypeCount
Public88
Academic45
School3
Consortium6
Special15

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,00012
[3] 100,001-250,0006
[4] 250,001-1,000,0005
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2020 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction302 1 1 3 2 6 14 58 120 97 87.838
ILS Functionality303 1 1 2 4 10 19 66 114 86 87.698
Print Functionality302 1 3 1 2 4 7 54 106 124 98.018
Electronic Functionality285 13 5 6 6 13 30 33 61 64 54 86.537
Company Satisfaction288 2 1 4 3 5 9 9 47 82 126 97.838
Support Satisfaction296 3 1 4 3 8 6 10 34 87 140 97.898
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty289 11 1 6 4 3 10 9 40 68 137 97.618
Open Source Interest181 17 3 5 2 11 4 9 12 44 97.7310

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS315 165.08%
Considering new Interface315 165.08%
System Installed on time?315 00.00%

Average Collection size: 510756

TypeCount
Public121
Academic100
School10
Consortium6
Special27

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0004
[2] 10,001-100,00011
[3] 100,001-250,0007
[4] 250,001-1,000,0006
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2019 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction279 1 2 5 5 8 15 62 92 89 87.658
ILS Functionality278 1 3 4 4 11 23 72 95 65 87.478
Print Functionality274 1 2 5 5 10 37 101 113 98.018
Electronic Functionality267 14 2 9 8 22 34 36 49 54 39 86.167
Company Satisfaction271 4 3 2 1 6 12 12 29 81 121 97.778
Support Satisfaction268 4 3 1 4 10 8 13 36 72 117 97.678
Support Improvement257 7 1 1 6 22 64 21 28 43 64 56.507
Company Loyalty257 17 1 9 1 12 15 9 25 52 116 97.148
Open Source Interest249 18 5 2 4 13 9 6 10 24 158 97.389

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS280 176.07%
Considering new Interface280 4817.14%
System Installed on time?280 24888.57%

Average Collection size: 6225175

TypeCount
Public84
Academic116
School9
Consortium7
Special17

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,00015
[3] 100,001-250,0004
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2018 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction254 1 2 2 2 4 10 13 55 79 86 97.678
ILS Functionality253 1 2 3 4 4 7 20 70 83 59 87.428
Print Functionality247 2 1 1 5 7 16 39 84 92 97.808
Electronic Functionality234 8 2 6 5 14 36 32 63 36 32 76.307
Company Satisfaction245 1 2 3 4 5 8 15 33 62 112 97.788
Support Satisfaction244 1 4 2 4 6 6 16 31 66 108 97.738
Support Improvement237 4 1 3 5 20 47 17 36 45 59 96.687
Company Loyalty247 13 4 3 2 14 11 25 58 117 97.498
Open Source Interest219 15 2 3 3 6 1 6 16 167 97.929

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS255 187.06%
Considering new Interface255 197.45%
System Installed on time?255 23290.98%

Average Collection size: 107262

TypeCount
Public89
Academic78
School8
Consortium4
Special24

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0002
[2] 10,001-100,00011
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2017 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction360 2 4 2 11 13 32 84 114 98 87.498
ILS Functionality358 2 1 4 3 12 16 45 86 116 73 87.278
Print Functionality356 4 2 1 4 12 9 22 65 131 106 87.588
Electronic Functionality342 12 5 15 14 19 42 58 59 75 43 86.177
Company Satisfaction345 1 3 4 4 7 20 29 53 95 129 97.598
Support Satisfaction345 3 3 1 6 10 24 29 53 79 137 97.528
Support Improvement329 3 1 9 26 84 34 34 62 76 56.617
Company Loyalty339 19 5 7 5 12 28 20 49 61 133 96.998
Open Source Interest325 22 5 2 5 19 10 8 17 24 213 97.469

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS364 328.79%
Considering new Interface364 4512.36%
System Installed on time?364 32489.01%

Average Collection size: 118002

TypeCount
Public124
Academic105
School21
Consortium9
Special31

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0002
[2] 10,001-100,0005
[3] 100,001-250,0002
[4] 250,001-1,000,0002
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2016 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction269 2 2 1 4 17 19 56 92 76 87.578
ILS Functionality269 1 4 3 3 17 23 68 101 49 87.358
Print Functionality268 4 3 2 3 10 18 47 104 77 87.608
Electronic Functionality260 13 11 13 18 34 31 55 60 25 86.077
Company Satisfaction262 2 2 3 3 7 16 27 34 80 88 97.478
Support Satisfaction256 2 3 3 5 7 20 22 35 75 84 97.368
Support Improvement245 2 2 3 3 13 65 26 35 42 54 56.607
Company Loyalty249 10 7 5 5 7 19 14 32 53 97 97.078
Open Source Interest238 18 2 4 2 7 13 3 7 23 159 97.539

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS275 176.18%
Considering new Interface275 3512.73%
System Installed on time?275 23384.73%

Average Collection size: 134577

TypeCount
Public105
Academic86
School12
Consortium2
Special24

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0000
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2015 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction270 5 2 2 4 3 12 20 59 85 78 87.438
ILS Functionality271 3 1 2 6 7 8 27 61 104 52 87.318
Print Functionality268 3 5 5 4 3 7 8 40 102 91 87.608
Electronic Functionality256 17 5 4 9 14 26 36 54 55 36 86.197
Company Satisfaction260 5 3 2 6 7 13 22 35 71 96 97.418
Support Satisfaction258 5 2 5 7 5 16 21 31 69 97 97.378
Support Improvement249 7 1 2 5 13 63 21 17 40 80 96.717
Company Loyalty251 19 2 6 7 8 18 19 15 53 104 96.928
Open Source Interest228 19 5 3 3 8 6 3 6 17 158 97.469

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS277 103.61%
Considering new Interface277 3311.91%
System Installed on time?277 24889.53%

Average Collection size: 145133

TypeCount
Public120
Academic64
School13
Consortium10
Special23

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0000
[2] 10,001-100,0001
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2014 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction230 1 3 2 2 14 23 64 73 48 87.368
ILS Functionality230 1 5 2 4 12 33 68 62 43 77.177
Print Functionality222 1 3 2 2 10 17 39 89 59 87.608
Electronic Functionality222 8 6 6 5 18 30 27 53 47 22 76.147
Company Satisfaction225 1 6 2 5 13 17 41 61 79 97.528
Support Satisfaction221 1 3 4 4 7 13 22 32 57 78 97.388
Support Improvement213 2 3 3 5 16 52 18 29 33 52 56.537
Company Loyalty209 8 4 2 4 10 18 16 23 45 79 97.078
Open Source Interest196 10 2 3 4 4 7 2 6 21 137 97.799

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS237 166.75%
Considering new Interface237 3313.92%
System Installed on time?237 20285.23%

Average Collection size: 173934

TypeCount
Public99
Academic56
School13
Consortium8
Special20

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0001
[3] 100,001-250,0001
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2013 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction194 2 1 2 4 3 6 17 42 58 59 97.478
ILS Functionality194 2 1 4 2 4 9 17 53 61 41 87.258
Print Functionality193 1 1 7 5 7 10 25 74 63 87.638
Electronic Functionality183 9 8 5 4 8 19 31 37 35 27 76.157
Company Satisfaction186 3 4 4 2 2 9 11 26 46 79 97.528
Support Satisfaction185 2 5 7 1 1 9 15 28 39 78 97.418
Support Improvement178 5 4 2 3 4 37 21 20 32 50 96.697
Company Loyalty186 12 5 4 1 5 12 8 21 29 89 97.128
Open Source Interest168 8 4 1 3 2 7 6 4 3 130 97.839

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS199 115.53%
Considering new Interface199 2914.57%
System Installed on time?199 16884.42%

Average Collection size: 547867

TypeCount
Public75
Academic52
School13
Consortium5
Special17

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0008
[3] 100,001-250,0001
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2012 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction152 3 2 3 4 3 11 35 50 41 87.388
ILS Functionality152 1 4 6 4 6 12 39 46 34 87.188
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction149 3 1 1 7 7 4 7 24 36 59 97.398
Support Satisfaction147 5 4 2 6 2 3 8 27 39 51 97.198
Support Improvement140 3 2 4 4 7 26 14 19 25 36 96.587
Company Loyalty143 11 3 2 3 4 8 7 17 24 64 97.008
Open Source Interest139 8 1 1 4 4 2 6 8 105 97.939

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS157 74.46%
Considering new Interface157 117.01%
System Installed on time?157 12982.17%

Average Collection size: 173045

TypeCount
Public69
Academic38
School7
Consortium3
Special15

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0000
[2] 10,001-100,0000
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2011 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction166 5 2 4 2 5 9 13 34 53 39 87.068
ILS Functionality163 3 2 4 4 4 7 17 53 42 27 76.907
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction159 7 3 8 5 3 12 6 19 42 54 96.908
Support Satisfaction159 6 6 8 7 1 7 14 20 36 54 96.798
Support Improvement153 4 1 5 5 7 35 18 14 25 39 96.447
Company Loyalty158 17 4 4 3 3 12 11 11 23 70 96.658
Open Source Interest136 9 1 1 3 3 5 2 8 9 95 97.689

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS170 116.47%
Considering new Interface170 2112.35%
System Installed on time?170 13981.76%

Average Collection size: 125739

TypeCount
Public73
Academic43
School11
Consortium3
Special14

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0004
[3] 100,001-250,0001
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2010 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction127 1 3 2 4 11 36 28 42 97.548
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction120 2 2 3 4 15 6 14 27 47 97.318
Support Satisfaction122 3 1 1 5 4 9 13 13 29 44 97.188
Support Improvement123 4 1 1 2 5 19 9 14 18 50 97.078
Company Loyalty123 10 1 4 3 9 5 12 17 62 97.159
Open Source Interest118 1 1 1 1 1 3 110 98.749

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS131 86.11%
Considering new Interface131 1511.45%
System Installed on time?131 10983.21%

Average Collection size: 112613

TypeCount
Public56
Academic30
School9
Consortium5
Special8

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0000
[2] 10,001-100,0000
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2009 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction86 6 2 4 5 15 22 21 11 76.637
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction82 2 2 4 5 3 8 10 18 15 15 76.327
Support Satisfaction83 4 1 4 7 3 7 9 14 20 14 86.207
Support Improvement75 6 3 1 7 5 17 4 11 6 15 55.535
Company Loyalty80 13 2 2 1 12 4 9 15 22 95.967
Open Source Interest76 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 66 98.379

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS87 89.20%
Considering new Interface87 66.90%
System Installed on time?87 6574.71%





2008 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction33 3 2 2 7 6 8 5 86.337
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction33 2 1 3 2 1 2 8 7 7 76.397
Support Satisfaction33 2 1 1 1 2 4 6 5 5 6 66.036
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty33 4 1 3 1 3 1 4 5 11 96.007
Open Source Interest28 1 2 1 1 23 98.299

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS33 721.21%
Considering new Interface33 00.00%
System Installed on time?33 2575.76%





2007 Survey Results
Product: Koha Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction19 1 1 3 5 6 3 87.217
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction21 1 2 1 7 2 8 97.487
Support Satisfaction22 2 1 2 3 5 2 7 96.827
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty21 1 1 4 1 1 5 8 96.718
Open Source Interest24 1 1 1 21 98.679

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS27 311.11%
Considering new Interface27 311.11%
System Installed on time?27 00.00%




2024 : gen: 7.67 company 7.85 loyalty 7.78 support 7.81

2023 : gen: 7.75 company 7.96 loyalty 7.90 support 7.86

2022 : gen: 7.84 company 7.97 loyalty 7.85 support 7.98

2021 : gen: 7.85 company 7.99 loyalty 7.88 support 7.95

2020 : gen: 7.83 company 7.83 loyalty 7.61 support 7.89

2019 : gen: 7.65 company 7.77 loyalty 7.14 support 7.67

2018 : gen: 7.67 company 7.78 loyalty 7.49 support 7.73

2017 : gen: 7.49 company 7.59 loyalty 6.99 support 7.52

2016 : gen: 7.57 company 7.47 loyalty 7.07 support 7.36

2015 : gen: 7.43 company 7.41 loyalty 6.92 support 7.37

2014 : gen: 7.36 company 7.52 loyalty 7.07 support 7.38

2013 : gen: 7.47 company 7.52 loyalty 7.12 support 7.41

2012 : gen: 7.38 company 7.39 loyalty 7.00 support 7.19

2011 : gen: 7.06 company 6.90 loyalty 6.65 support 6.79

2010 : gen: 7.54 company 7.31 loyalty 7.15 support 7.18

2009 : gen: 6.63 company 6.32 loyalty 5.96 support 6.20

2008 : gen: 6.33 company 6.39 loyalty 6.00 support 6.03

2007 : gen: 7.21 company 7.48 loyalty 6.71 support 6.82

Comments (survey2024)

We don't use Koha to manage electronic resources but the link to Overdrive holdings is very helpful! (Library type: ; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 8)

Koha/Aspen has always worked very well for our purposes (small rural public library serving 3000 year round/~6000 during the summer). We went through an anomalous period this year where a number of odd glitches were cropping up after a slew of updates, but the reps were highly responsive and helpful in getting things sorted out, and things have been much more stable since then. (Library type: ; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 8)

Koha is open source (Library type: ; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 8)

We migrated to Koha in February 2024 and have overall been very happy. There were some challenges with getting EDI ordering set up, and a few lingering issues, however all are now resolved and it is working well. (Library type: ; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 8)

Community-Koha is a great product, is mature, and is very competitive with other ILSs and LMSs available to libraries. The justifications for these assertions include the usefulness of the modules of Koha, the comprehensiveness of the different library-related tasks that Koha can handle, the active development of the software, and the helpfulness and interest of Koha's network of user and support communities. The reason why I rated Koha at a 5 on the, "How effective is this product in managing your library's electronic resources?" question above is because I wish that Koha would directly API into OverDrive, Hoopla Digital, Gale databases, and other e-resource vendors to maintain a live index of those e-resources (including their availability for checkout), and empower my patrons to checkout and use those e-resources within Koha's OPAC. I am uncertain if any ILS or LMS can do that though. Aspen Discovery is a discovery service that come close to doing that and we are implementing Aspen next year. (Library type: Public; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 9)

For the product: Koha is an incredibly cost-effective ILS that does an excellent job managing physical resources. Flexibility is one of its strengths and has allowed us to develop and introduce new features such as a booking module, more flexible renewal rules, and improvements to acquisitions workflows. These features also become available to libraries using the software worldwide. That we own and can access our own data with an open-source ILS is another strength. Our vendor, ByWater Solutions, provides reliable hosting and high-touch support. Their development team has been an enthusiastic partner in realizing features we needed before migration and in continuously working on new features. Re: Electronic resources, we use our discovery layer to manage these rather than our ILS, so we skipped that question. (Library type: ; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 7)

We were a bit disappointed in some responses to our tickets concerning our self-checkout SIP systems. Generally, we find ByWater's staff to be responsive to tickets initially, especially if they can solve it quickly or provide a needed report. They have also worked quickly to get an outage on the server resolved fast. That is great; but our tickets had some problems that couldn't be solved immediately and we were told they were referred on to other teams. Then the waiting for weeks began with little response and our self-checkout continued to remain shut down. We had to send follow up message to prompt responses and then a month later, it was found that there was a setting on Koha's side that, once it was addressed, quickly brought us back up. I'm glad we are up and running now, but we are scratching our heads wondering if the setting was that hard to find or whether our problem slid down the priority list. I have noticed similar problems with one of our instances of Libki. There is some hiccup that isn't apparent and we sent logs from our computers for ByWater to follow up with. Many months later, we have heard next to nothing. In short, our feelings are a little mixed about ByWater's service this past year and a half. Some great things, and some not so great things with trickier hiccups. (Library type: Public; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 7)

We contract with Bywater Solutions for support of the Koha ILS. Initially for the first several years after we migrated in late 2016 we were impressed with their customer support. However, in recent years, it seems support doesn't respond in a timely manner or in a way that truly addresses the problems we need support with. We feel this may be growing pains as Bywater has added more clients and also more provide support for more products than they initially did. At this time we are not considering migrating to a new ILS because overall we do like Koha and some of the upgrades have been fabulous. (Library type: Law; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 6)

We still believe in ByWater Solutions in the long term. There has been concern about a high level of turnover of staff in the short term. It raises questions about why a substantial number of staff left in a matter of months and how that expertise will be replaced, and retained. Support has been more reactive to proactive than in past years and the direction of the organization is murkier than we would like. Ultimately I think this company will figure out a better path forward, but it may just take a little bit. (Library type: Consortium; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 9)

Our library currently does not use the ERM functionality of Koha, which is why I provided a 0 for the question on effectiveness on managing electronic resources. (Library type: Academic; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 9)

Our experiences with Koha and Aspen as Open Source ILS products favorably influences us. We would definitely be open to other Open Source software products that are as robustly supported. (Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)

Some key staff members left our Koha support vendor for other opportunities in 2024. It's a tad disconcerting each time another leaves. Thorough knowledge of Koha and its ever-evolving bugs takes time to gain. It has become clear over our time on the system that libraries using Koha need to have staff with strong technology skills. Self-reliance and participation in the Koha community and user groups is a key to success, even if you hire a support vendor. (Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 7)

With regards to the question about electronic resources management in ILS, we do not use Koha for this purpose. We manage our own Koha-installation, so we do not have a vendor company. Concering "Open Source Considerations", we did not answer because we already have an open source system (Library type: Academic; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 7)

We are a ILS user and also a service provider, some of the questions do not apply (Library type: National; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 8)

PTFS Europe was responsible for the data migration and upgrade of the library catalog based on Koha open-source from 3.22 to 23.11 version. The company is currently in charge of the maintenance and hosting of the catalog. I would recommend the implementation of an open-source software for a small-medium library such as the one at [...] (Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 8)

ILS