Statistical Report for Bibliovation
Statistics according to type and size categories
The following table presents the 2024 results according to the type and size of the library.
| 2024 Bibliovation Responses by Sector |
|---|
| Bibliovation | all | Academic | Public | School | Consortium |
|---|
| | small | medium | large | small | medium | large | | |
|---|
| n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg |
|---|
| SatisfactionLevelILS | 3 | |
0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| ILSFunctionality | 3 | |
0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| PrintFunctionality | 3 | |
0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| ElectronicFunctionality | 3 | |
0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| SatisfactionCustomerSupport | 3 | |
0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| CompanyLoyalty | 3 | |
0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| 3 Responses for Bibliovation in 2024 |
| 2 Responses for Bibliovation in 2023 |
| 2022 Survey Results |
| Product: Bibliovation |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 10 |
| | 1 | 1 | | | 2 | 2 | 4 | | 8 | 6.30 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 10 |
| | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 5 | 2 | | 7 | 6.30 | 7 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 10 |
| | | | 2 | | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6.70 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 9 |
| | | 2 | 1 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5.89 | 6 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 10 |
| | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6.40 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 10 |
| | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 6.50 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 10 |
1 | | | 1 | | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5.90 | 6 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 8 |
2 | | | 1 | | 2 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.50 | 5 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 11 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 11 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 11 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 402130 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 5 |
|---|
| Academic | 1 |
|---|
| School | 0 |
|---|
| Consortium | 1 |
|---|
| Special | 0 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 5 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2021 Survey Results |
| Product: Bibliovation |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 9 |
| | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | | | 7 | 5.89 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 9 |
| | | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | | 7 | 6.22 | 7 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 9 |
| | | | | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7.11 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 9 |
| | 2 | | 1 | 4 | | 1 | 1 | | 5 | 4.78 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 9 |
| | | 1 | | 1 | | 5 | 2 | | 7 | 6.56 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 9 |
| | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6.56 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 9 |
1 | | 1 | | | | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5.89 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 7 |
1 | | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5.43 | 6 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 9 |
3 | 33.33% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 9 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 9 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 149372 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 3 |
|---|
| Academic | 0 |
|---|
| School | 2 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 0 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 6 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 4 Responses for Bibliovation in 2020 |
| 2 Responses for Bibliovation in 2019 |
| 2 Responses for Bibliovation in 2018 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2017 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2016 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2015 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2014 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2013 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2012 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2011 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2010 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2009 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2008 |
| 0 Responses for Bibliovation in 2007 |
2022 : gen: 6.30 company 6.40 loyalty 5.90 support 6.50
2021 : gen: 5.89 company 6.56 loyalty 5.89 support 6.56
Comments (survey2024)
I would consider the discovery layer from Bywater. With Bibliovation, the development is slow and we constantly get our needs put aside when something more interesting to the programmers comes up. We've been waiting years for some development and the simplest things don't seem to work. Items can have two statuses, if you have a bib record that doesn't allow holds and a staff person overrides that and places a hold then anyone can places holds on that bib. There are so many bugs, our system had to create a database. The most frustrating thing lately is that APIs don't work well and a SIP2 connection costs $2000 per connection and usually takes additional programming to get it to work. So using 3rd part solutions is problematic if you can get them to work at all. Also new features are non-existent unless the US government wants them. Quite often, they are things that public libraries can't use. They don't normalize data so searching when there's punctuation or symbols in the field is difficult at best.
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 0)