Statistical Report for Horizon
Statistics according to type and size categories
The following table presents the 2020 results according to the type and size of the library.
| 2020 Horizon Responses by Sector |
|---|
| Horizon | all | Academic | Public | School | Consortium |
|---|
| | small | medium | large | small | medium | large | | |
|---|
| n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg |
|---|
| SatisfactionLevelILS | 82 | 6.89 |
11 | 6.27 | 5 | | 1 | | 23 | 7.35 | 25 | 6.80 | 5 | | 3 | | 3 | |
|---|
| ILSFunctionality | 82 | 6.91 |
11 | 6.55 | 5 | | 1 | | 23 | 7.30 | 25 | 7.08 | 5 | | 3 | | 3 | |
|---|
| PrintFunctionality | 82 | 7.72 |
11 | 7.09 | 5 | | 1 | | 23 | 7.83 | 25 | 7.56 | 5 | | 3 | | 3 | |
|---|
| ElectronicFunctionality | 82 | 5.46 |
11 | 4.00 | 5 | | 1 | | 23 | 6.30 | 25 | 5.52 | 5 | | 3 | | 3 | |
|---|
| SatisfactionCustomerSupport | 81 | 7.84 |
11 | 8.45 | 5 | | 1 | | 22 | 7.73 | 25 | 7.52 | 5 | | 3 | | 3 | |
|---|
| CompanyLoyalty | 79 | 7.25 |
11 | 7.55 | 5 | | 1 | | 21 | 7.29 | 24 | 7.17 | 5 | | 3 | | 3 | |
|---|
| 2020 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 82 |
| | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 32 | 17 | 12 | 7 | 6.89 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 82 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 28 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 6.91 | 7 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 82 |
| | | | 1 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 31 | 21 | 8 | 7.72 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 82 |
4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 20 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 5.46 | 6 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 82 |
| | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 25 | 21 | 8 | 7.43 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 81 |
| | 1 | | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 24 | 34 | 9 | 7.84 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 79 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 23 | 23 | 8 | 7.25 | 8 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 71 |
16 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3.48 | 3 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 82 |
28 | 34.15% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 82 |
6 | 7.32% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 82 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 402927 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 54 |
|---|
| Academic | 17 |
|---|
| School | 3 |
|---|
| Consortium | 3 |
|---|
| Special | 1 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 27 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 19 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 24 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 8 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2019 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 83 |
| 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 11 | 6 | 6.57 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 83 |
| 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 16 | 7 | 7 | 6.36 | 7 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 83 |
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 26 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 7.34 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 82 |
8 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4.88 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 83 |
| 3 | 1 | | 5 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 6.83 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 81 |
| | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 23 | 28 | 9 | 7.38 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 80 |
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 6.34 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 80 |
4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 6.75 | 8 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 79 |
29 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2.70 | 1 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 84 |
21 | 25.00% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 84 |
6 | 7.14% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 84 |
75 | 89.29% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 592571 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 57 |
|---|
| Academic | 19 |
|---|
| School | 0 |
|---|
| Consortium | 2 |
|---|
| Special | 1 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 20 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 15 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 30 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 13 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2018 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 99 |
1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 26 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 6 | 6.28 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 99 |
| 2 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 16 | 19 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 6 | 6.00 | 6 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 96 |
1 | | | | 7 | 3 | 19 | 27 | 26 | 13 | 7 | 6.99 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 94 |
4 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4.50 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 98 |
| 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 23 | 14 | 8 | 6.49 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 95 |
| | 1 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 27 | 9 | 7.14 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 97 |
1 | | 1 | 3 | 13 | 34 | 6 | 13 | 11 | 15 | 5 | 6.01 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 97 |
3 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 22 | 9 | 6.31 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 98 |
25 | 11 | 16 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3.10 | 2 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 100 |
35 | 35.00% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 100 |
13 | 13.00% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 100 |
90 | 90.00% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 517702 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 58 |
|---|
| Academic | 25 |
|---|
| School | 1 |
|---|
| Consortium | 5 |
|---|
| Special | 1 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 27 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 26 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 29 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 13 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2017 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 131 |
| 1 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 19 | 15 | 37 | 31 | 13 | 7 | 6.54 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 131 |
| | 7 | 5 | 8 | 14 | 23 | 38 | 32 | 4 | 7 | 6.31 | 7 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 131 |
| | | 2 | 6 | 11 | 13 | 29 | 42 | 28 | 8 | 7.28 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 129 |
5 | 8 | 14 | 14 | 9 | 22 | 19 | 20 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 4.86 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 131 |
| | 5 | 2 | 9 | 13 | 12 | 31 | 46 | 13 | 8 | 6.80 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 129 |
| 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 37 | 29 | 8 | 7.01 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 129 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 50 | 10 | 21 | 15 | 12 | 5 | 5.80 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 129 |
4 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 13 | 21 | 16 | 32 | 21 | 8 | 6.29 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 129 |
31 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 14 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3.12 | 2 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 133 |
42 | 31.58% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 133 |
18 | 13.53% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 133 |
116 | 87.22% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 847056 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 82 |
|---|
| Academic | 29 |
|---|
| School | 2 |
|---|
| Consortium | 7 |
|---|
| Special | 1 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 42 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 28 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 44 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 13 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 1 |
|---|
| 2016 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 97 |
| | 2 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 22 | 11 | 7 | 6.76 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 99 |
| | 2 | 6 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 33 | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6.56 | 7 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 99 |
| | | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 26 | 36 | 21 | 8 | 7.49 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 97 |
4 | 5 | 7 | 16 | 3 | 12 | 14 | 21 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5.11 | 6 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 98 |
| | | 3 | 7 | 5 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 17 | 8 | 7.01 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 97 |
1 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 28 | 24 | 8 | 7.22 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 99 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 23 | 20 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 5 | 6.06 | 6 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 99 |
3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 9 | 6.55 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 95 |
28 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2.99 | 2 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 99 |
28 | 28.28% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 99 |
15 | 15.15% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 99 |
92 | 92.93% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 1123422 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 56 |
|---|
| Academic | 24 |
|---|
| School | 2 |
|---|
| Consortium | 6 |
|---|
| Special | 3 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 31 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 19 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 29 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 14 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 1 |
|---|
| 2015 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 108 |
| 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 13 | 21 | 28 | 22 | 6 | 7 | 6.23 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 108 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 13 | 22 | 27 | 21 | 6 | 7 | 6.19 | 7 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 108 |
1 | | 1 | | 1 | 12 | 18 | 22 | 37 | 16 | 8 | 7.11 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 106 |
5 | 11 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 17 | 14 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 4.61 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 108 |
| 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 27 | 29 | 11 | 8 | 6.54 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 106 |
| 1 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 29 | 31 | 17 | 8 | 6.82 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 105 |
| | 3 | 3 | 11 | 29 | 13 | 20 | 15 | 11 | 5 | 6.10 | 6 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 108 |
6 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 18 | 23 | 9 | 6.13 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 104 |
33 | 16 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2.62 | 2 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 109 |
37 | 33.94% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 109 |
18 | 16.51% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 109 |
97 | 88.99% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 479033 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 61 |
|---|
| Academic | 30 |
|---|
| School | 1 |
|---|
| Consortium | 6 |
|---|
| Special | 2 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 30 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 26 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 34 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 14 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2014 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 127 |
| 5 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 26 | 20 | 31 | 21 | 4 | 7 | 5.81 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 127 |
| 4 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 21 | 19 | 31 | 19 | 1 | 7 | 5.55 | 6 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 127 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 28 | 40 | 17 | 8 | 6.78 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 125 |
9 | 13 | 17 | 13 | 19 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4.03 | 4 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 127 |
1 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 23 | 27 | 12 | 8 | 6.04 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 126 |
2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 16 | 11 | 30 | 35 | 14 | 8 | 6.45 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 127 |
3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 42 | 16 | 14 | 14 | 11 | 5 | 5.50 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 125 |
8 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 12 | 21 | 27 | 15 | 8 | 5.77 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 127 |
30 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3.34 | 3 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 128 |
55 | 42.97% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 128 |
26 | 20.31% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 128 |
108 | 84.38% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 478138 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 81 |
|---|
| Academic | 30 |
|---|
| School | 2 |
|---|
| Consortium | 5 |
|---|
| Special | 0 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 41 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 29 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 33 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 15 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2013 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 104 |
3 | 1 | | 11 | 11 | 15 | 14 | 18 | 25 | 6 | 8 | 5.93 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 104 |
1 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 13 | 22 | 18 | 6 | 7 | 5.71 | 6 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 103 |
| | 1 | 3 | 7 | 15 | 10 | 18 | 31 | 18 | 8 | 6.89 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 102 |
7 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 4.19 | 4 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 103 |
2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 11 | 22 | 18 | 14 | 7 | 6.11 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 103 |
1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 28 | 23 | 8 | 6.60 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 100 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 36 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 15 | 5 | 5.72 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 103 |
8 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 5 | 5.64 | 6 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 103 |
25 | 9 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 3.43 | 3 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 108 |
48 | 44.44% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 108 |
31 | 28.70% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 108 |
93 | 86.11% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 631804 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 68 |
|---|
| Academic | 20 |
|---|
| School | 3 |
|---|
| Consortium | 7 |
|---|
| Special | 0 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 29 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 23 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 38 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 11 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 1 |
|---|
| 2012 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 140 |
4 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 14 | 44 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 5.81 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 140 |
2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 41 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 5.76 | 6 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 140 |
2 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 12 | 17 | 21 | 32 | 25 | 8 | 7 | 5.80 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 139 |
1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 19 | 16 | 25 | 36 | 18 | 8 | 6.43 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 137 |
3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 55 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 13 | 5 | 5.66 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 139 |
16 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 5.33 | 6 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 136 |
33 | 12 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 11 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 3.38 | 3 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 145 |
72 | 49.66% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 145 |
41 | 28.28% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 145 |
129 | 88.97% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 509664 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 103 |
|---|
| Academic | 24 |
|---|
| School | 1 |
|---|
| Consortium | 9 |
|---|
| Special | 1 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 7 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 36 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 30 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 41 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 18 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2011 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 149 |
2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 28 | 22 | 44 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 5.91 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 141 |
1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 21 | 24 | 36 | 20 | 12 | 7 | 6.01 | 6 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 149 |
2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 36 | 29 | 8 | 7 | 5.94 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 147 |
| 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 13 | 23 | 29 | 40 | 18 | 8 | 6.55 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 147 |
1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 49 | 17 | 23 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 5.97 | 6 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 149 |
10 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 21 | 29 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 5.72 | 6 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 146 |
31 | 15 | 16 | 11 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 3.75 | 4 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 150 |
82 | 54.67% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 150 |
45 | 30.00% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 150 |
139 | 92.67% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 639134 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 101 |
|---|
| Academic | 31 |
|---|
| School | 4 |
|---|
| Consortium | 8 |
|---|
| Special | 1 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 37 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 37 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 47 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 14 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 1 |
|---|
| 2010 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 179 |
1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 20 | 24 | 31 | 44 | 27 | 13 | 7 | 5.99 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 179 |
4 | 3 | 19 | 15 | 18 | 29 | 22 | 43 | 19 | 7 | 7 | 5.31 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 179 |
4 | 4 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 17 | 23 | 45 | 24 | 16 | 7 | 5.73 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 179 |
10 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 25 | 55 | 17 | 23 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 4.80 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 179 |
21 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 31 | 19 | 14 | 7 | 4.94 | 5 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 176 |
31 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 16 | 14 | 14 | 27 | 0 | 4.44 | 5 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 185 |
106 | 57.30% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 185 |
65 | 35.14% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 185 |
162 | 87.57% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 399582 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 137 |
|---|
| Academic | 27 |
|---|
| School | 3 |
|---|
| Consortium | 5 |
|---|
| Special | 4 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 45 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 48 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 52 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 13 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2009 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 190 |
3 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 24 | 25 | 69 | 31 | 7 | 7 | 6.07 | 7 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 188 |
4 | 14 | 19 | 21 | 21 | 23 | 25 | 37 | 16 | 8 | 7 | 4.91 | 5 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 188 |
3 | 5 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 31 | 25 | 39 | 28 | 17 | 7 | 5.77 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 177 |
6 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 21 | 59 | 25 | 16 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 4.89 | 5 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 186 |
26 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 30 | 16 | 26 | 22 | 15 | 5 | 4.75 | 5 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 185 |
27 | 13 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 20 | 18 | 23 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 4.25 | 4 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 197 |
90 | 45.69% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 197 |
48 | 24.37% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 197 |
159 | 80.71% |
|---|
| 2008 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 206 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 18 | 24 | 20 | 41 | 54 | 31 | 3 | 7 | 5.68 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 206 |
17 | 10 | 22 | 25 | 31 | 33 | 25 | 27 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 4.32 | 4 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 206 |
8 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 37 | 40 | 31 | 8 | 7 | 5.35 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 0 |
not applicable |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 206 |
25 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 24 | 33 | 21 | 21 | 14 | 17 | 5 | 4.37 | 5 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 206 |
21 | 22 | 18 | 14 | 18 | 22 | 15 | 26 | 15 | 35 | 9 | 4.80 | 5 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 208 |
127 | 61.06% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 208 |
59 | 28.37% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 208 |
189 | 90.87% |
|---|
| 2007 Survey Results |
| Product: Horizon |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 178 |
1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 22 | 48 | 56 | 24 | 5 | 7 | 6.13 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 271 |
17 | 14 | 22 | 33 | 46 | 44 | 40 | 33 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 4.49 | 5 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 270 |
2 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 25 | 32 | 47 | 58 | 50 | 18 | 7 | 5.89 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 0 |
not applicable |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 269 |
28 | 17 | 21 | 21 | 34 | 65 | 29 | 29 | 16 | 9 | 5 | 4.35 | 5 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 269 |
35 | 25 | 32 | 27 | 26 | 36 | 24 | 25 | 17 | 22 | 5 | 4.12 | 4 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 274 |
136 | 49.64% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 274 |
66 | 24.09% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 274 |
1 | 0.36% |
|---|
2020 : gen: 6.89 company 7.43 loyalty 7.25 support 7.84
2019 : gen: 6.57 company 6.83 loyalty 6.75 support 7.38
2018 : gen: 6.28 company 6.49 loyalty 6.31 support 7.14
2017 : gen: 6.54 company 6.80 loyalty 6.29 support 7.01
2016 : gen: 6.76 company 7.01 loyalty 6.55 support 7.22
2015 : gen: 6.23 company 6.54 loyalty 6.13 support 6.82
2014 : gen: 5.81 company 6.04 loyalty 5.77 support 6.45
2013 : gen: 5.93 company 6.11 loyalty 5.64 support 6.60
2012 : gen: 5.81 company 5.80 loyalty 5.33 support 6.43
2011 : gen: 5.91 company 5.94 loyalty 5.72 support 6.55
2010 : gen: 5.99 company 5.31 loyalty 4.94 support 5.73
2009 : gen: 6.07 company 4.91 loyalty 4.75 support 5.77
2008 : gen: 5.68 company 4.32 loyalty 4.37 support 5.35
2007 : gen: 6.13 company 4.49 loyalty 4.35 support 5.89
Comments (survey2020)
I've stated what systems we are using RIGHT NOW - but we are getting toward the end of our Alma implementation project and we will go live January 2021. Alma/Primo is due for Go Live Jan 2021
(Library type: Academic; collection size: large; ils satisfaction: 4)
While I admire the efforts of the folks developing FOLIO, time has shown over and over again that OS solutions are half-baked, and to get sufficient functionality and support you have to purchase a proprietary solution or hire a team of programmers to further develop the system for your internal needs. Small and medium-sized academic libraries don't have that luxury. ***
Our library has been a SirsiDynix customer for decades, but they have almost completely failed the academic market. I've held out as long as I can waiting on them to provide a comparable solution to Alma or WMS, but I don't foresee staying with SD once my multi-year contract expires. Trying to write an overlay that would work with two incompatible systems was not the solution we needed. That being said, I still love the company, the employees, and the support they provide, which makes the decision to migrate all the more difficult. Unfortunately, I am also deeply tired of nursing along a nearly 30-year-old system (a problem which won't go away even if BLUEcloud does work someday), being charged an astonishing amount for each incrementally released new functionality component rather than having an all-in-one solution, and needing to manage multiple products from multiple vendors to get anything close to an adequate setup for a 21st-century academic library.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 2)
It would be useful and interesting to include discovery services used by public libraries e.g. BiblioCommons in this survey for broader comparison and consideration.
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 8)
Horizon generally does the things that it was designed to do quite well, but it is rather old and lacking in some important newer features. The lack of an API makes interoperability with some new services difficult.
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 7)
My library does not make the decisions regarding ILS.
(Library type: Public; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 9)
We haven't looked deeply into the ILS market since 2008, so we are in the beginning stages of doing that research in preparation for an RFP. We feel that SirsiDynix is letting their core products (Horizon in our case) lag while they keep adding new products for niche markets. It's also been so many years since they introduced BLUEcloud Central and the promise hasn't lived up to reality yet.
(Library type: Public; collection size: large; ils satisfaction: 6)
I feel that ILS is doing a fine job. Headquarters usually finds answers to our questions.
(Library type: Public; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 8)
we are not that far along it is part of a 5 year plan
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 5)
We are generally displeased with our ILS and feel that the discovery service was forced on us a year ago. Because the tech services manager also administers to these systems, little-to-no time is available to devote to these expensive content management tools. Because of the economic climate and the population loss in our publicly funded service area we are switching to the state's consortium upon completion of the current contract. We do feel that the money spent on our ILS and all accompanying facets of it are not money well spent because of gaps in staffing.
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 4)
We have been very pleased with our ILS vendor, SirsiDynix. In the last year they introduced much needed security updates, along with new functionality, including merging duplicate borrower records and borrower passwords. Their support was exceptional in responding to the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, including providing consultation on re-configuring the ILS to respond to our members service changes, and general support articles about how to handle basic changes such as delaying hold notices, updating notice language, and modifying holds and circulation rules to accommodate new quarantine periods for returned items.
Additionally, the customizability of Horizon allowed us to configure the ILS in manner that supported all our member's COVID policy changes without having to say that we couldn't do it because of limitations in the ILS.
(Library type: Consortium; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 8)
Sales support is almost non existent since [...] left out jurisdiction.
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 6)
[...] is in the RFP process for an ILS.
(Library type: Public; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 8)
The SirsiDynix Horizon product needs to be tailored to the exact needs of the library rather than packaging modules together that may no longer be needed. For our FTE and small collection, the cost is becoming too great. That's why we are considering changing.
The reason why I only gave a 2 to the question about electronic resources is because we don't include the marc records for most eResources in our "classic" catalog. Bibliographic control is too time-consuming. We encourage students to use the discovery service for everything except requests. As soon as there is a way to include requests in our discovery service, we will eliminate the OPAC entirely.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 7)
[...]
(Library type: Medical; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 7)
User interface is somewhat dated.
(Library type: Law; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 7)
I have been consistently impressed with the quality of customer support provided by SirsiDynix (Horizon). This was exemplified during COVID where we had to make numerous system modifications to accommodate closures and evolving services. Customer support was there to help with the ILS changes while also providing documentation and free training, and this help was invaluable.
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 7)
The vendor offers products that would help meet our electronic resource needs. We cannot implement them at this time. While the system does not meet the needs of some very ambitious new programs, it has the ability to be customized and that work is underway.
(Library type: Public; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 7)
Pretty much the same feedback as we've done for the last decade. Horizon is old but functional. It works. It doesn't look very pretty, and some components are absolutely horrible (itypes and changing budget dollars in ACQ - who designed it so the human has to pull out a calculator to get the correct numbers? It's a computer. As in compute!). Blue Cloud Cataloguing and Circ are still missing vital features we need (after about 8 years of SirsiDynix working on them!) so we haven't moved to those. We've looked at pretty much everything and no ILS/LSP looks significantly better to justify the huge time and effort for a migration. Horizon is like an old jalopy. It doesn't look good and doesn't move very fast and it's hard to find the right parts to fix it, but it still gets us to our destination. And hey, I retire in 15 years! Maybe by then SirsiDynix might have finished Blue Cloud! Or maybe not...
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 5)
We are very happy with our current ILS. SirsiDynix consistently provides excellent customer service whenever we have needed support.
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)
Current ILMS is suitable and has been maintained but have been advised as its now 18 years old that it is time to go to Market. Would be looking at a Cloud solution so we have less reliance on our ICT staff.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 7)
[...]
(Library type: Special; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)