Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for ReDiscovery

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2021

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2020

Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2019 results according to the type and size of the library.

2019 ReDiscovery Responses by Sector
ReDiscoveryallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS1 00000000
ILSFunctionality1 00000000
PrintFunctionality1 00000000
ElectronicFunctionality1 00000000
SatisfactionCustomerSupport1 00000000
CompanyLoyalty1 00000000


1 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2019

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2018

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2017

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2016

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2015

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2014

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2013

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2012

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2011

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2010

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2009

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2008

0 Responses for ReDiscovery in 2007

Comments (survey2019)

We moved to this software so that our whole agency could be on the same platform. This software was originally designed for archaeological and museum collections. The company's emphasis, product development, and training seems to continue in those directions. The library module has some key deficiencies for us but there doesn't seem to be any interest on Proficio's part in making changes or developing it further. There are always priorities in software development and unfortunately the library portion of ReDiscovery does not seem to make the cut. In addition, the discovery interface is pretty terrible and we have successfully fought our IT department in the public roll-out. (Library type: Special; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 4)

ILS