Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for Presto for DB/Text

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2021

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2020

Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2019 results according to the type and size of the library.

2019 Presto for DB/Text Responses by Sector
Presto for DB/TextallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS2 00000000
ILSFunctionality2 00000000
PrintFunctionality2 00000000
ElectronicFunctionality2 00000000
SatisfactionCustomerSupport2 00000000
CompanyLoyalty2 00000000


2 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2019

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2018

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2017

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2016

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2015

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2014

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2013

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2012

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2011

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2010

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2009

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2008

0 Responses for Presto for DB/Text in 2007

Comments (survey2019)

The DB/TextWorks backend is highly customizable in all components even for solo staff with only intermediate technological skills and there is no need to request vendor support for batch updates or new metadata fields. We are able to have separate cataloging / metadata options for bibliographic items, physical artifacts, and projects (our implementation does not use MARC, though). This year's upgrade of the Presto OPAC greatly improved the mobile interface and responsive design. Vendor has been very responsive to feature requests. (Library type: Special; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 8)

ILS