Statistical Report for Koha -- Independent
Statistics according to type and size categories
The following table presents the 2019 results according to the type and size of the library.
| 2019 Koha -- Independent Responses by Sector |
|---|
| Koha -- Independent | all | Academic | Public | School | Consortium |
|---|
| | small | medium | large | small | medium | large | | |
|---|
| n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg |
|---|
| SatisfactionLevelILS | 53 | 8.06 |
20 | 8.05 | 7 | 8.29 | 2 | | 6 | 8.17 | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 1 | |
|---|
| ILSFunctionality | 53 | 7.81 |
20 | 8.00 | 7 | 8.00 | 2 | | 6 | 7.17 | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 1 | |
|---|
| PrintFunctionality | 51 | 8.14 |
19 | 8.00 | 7 | 8.29 | 2 | | 6 | 7.83 | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 1 | |
|---|
| ElectronicFunctionality | 52 | 6.44 |
20 | 6.70 | 7 | 6.14 | 1 | | 6 | 6.50 | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 1 | |
|---|
| SatisfactionCustomerSupport | 47 | 7.21 |
17 | 7.12 | 7 | 7.14 | 1 | | 6 | 7.33 | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 1 | |
|---|
| CompanyLoyalty | 43 | 6.33 |
16 | 5.94 | 4 | 6.00 | 1 | | 6 | 6.67 | 0 | | 0 | | 2 | | 1 | |
|---|
| 2019 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 53 |
| | | | | 1 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 23 | 9 | 8.06 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 53 |
| | | | | 3 | 5 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 9 | 7.81 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 51 |
| | 1 | | | | | 9 | 19 | 22 | 9 | 8.14 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 52 |
3 | | | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 6.44 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 48 |
2 | 1 | | | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 23 | 9 | 7.46 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 47 |
3 | | | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 21 | 9 | 7.21 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 47 |
3 | | | | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 9 | 6.53 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 43 |
5 | | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 15 | 9 | 6.33 | 8 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 50 |
4 | | | | 2 | 2 | | | 4 | 38 | 9 | 7.84 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 53 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 53 |
13 | 24.53% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 53 |
39 | 73.58% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 326459 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 6 |
|---|
| Academic | 30 |
|---|
| School | 2 |
|---|
| Consortium | 1 |
|---|
| Special | 4 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 5 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 25 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 9 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 7 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 4 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2018 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 37 |
| | | | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 8.03 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 37 |
| | | 2 | | 1 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 15 | 9 | 7.84 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 36 |
| | | | 1 | | 1 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 8.19 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 33 |
1 | | | | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6.76 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 32 |
| | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 15 | 9 | 7.72 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 32 |
| 1 | | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 9 | 7.63 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 30 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 6.47 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 31 |
1 | 1 | | | | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 9 | 7.71 | 9 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 31 |
2 | | | 1 | | | | | 4 | 24 | 9 | 8.10 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 37 |
1 | 2.70% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 37 |
3 | 8.11% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 37 |
30 | 81.08% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 141490 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 4 |
|---|
| Academic | 13 |
|---|
| School | 2 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 5 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 15 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 4 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 8 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2017 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 61 |
| | 1 | | | 3 | 6 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 7.66 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 61 |
| | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 5 | 15 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 7.64 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 61 |
1 | | 1 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 21 | 25 | 9 | 7.80 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 58 |
3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 6.10 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 51 |
| | 1 | | | 4 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 21 | 9 | 7.67 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 52 |
2 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 7.08 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 49 |
| | 1 | | 3 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 5 | 6.82 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 52 |
2 | | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 9 | 6.85 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 55 |
2 | | | 2 | 2 | | | 1 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 8.18 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 62 |
3 | 4.84% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 62 |
11 | 17.74% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 62 |
39 | 62.90% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 197946 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 6 |
|---|
| Academic | 29 |
|---|
| School | 6 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 9 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 7 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 30 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 8 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 10 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2016 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 75 |
| | 2 | | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 23 | 25 | 9 | 7.60 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 75 |
| | 2 | | | 6 | 7 | 15 | 26 | 19 | 8 | 7.47 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 75 |
1 | | 1 | | | 3 | 6 | 12 | 28 | 24 | 8 | 7.69 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 74 |
2 | | 6 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 7 | 5.97 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 69 |
1 | 1 | 2 | | 4 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 6.96 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 68 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 15 | 8 | 6.63 | 7 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 68 |
1 | 2 | | 2 | 4 | 15 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 9 | 6.50 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 63 |
4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 19 | 9 | 6.24 | 8 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 66 |
3 | 1 | | | 2 | 2 | | 1 | 7 | 50 | 9 | 8.06 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 78 |
4 | 5.13% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 78 |
15 | 19.23% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 78 |
51 | 65.38% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 253881 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 11 |
|---|
| Academic | 39 |
|---|
| School | 6 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 12 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 6 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 42 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 10 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 8 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 4 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2015 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 44 |
1 | | | 2 | | 1 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 23 | 9 | 7.89 | 9 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 45 |
1 | | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 5 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 7.89 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 45 |
| 2 | 1 | | | 1 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 22 | 9 | 7.84 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 44 |
| 2 | | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6.45 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 36 |
| 1 | | 1 | | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 9 | 7.47 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 35 |
3 | | 1 | | | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 6.80 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 34 |
2 | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 6.32 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 32 |
7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 5.38 | 7 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 35 |
3 | 1 | | | | 1 | | | 1 | 29 | 9 | 7.86 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 46 |
3 | 6.52% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 46 |
6 | 13.04% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 46 |
32 | 69.57% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 224897 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 7 |
|---|
| Academic | 15 |
|---|
| School | 4 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 8 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 6 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 23 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 6 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2014 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 51 |
| | | | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 8 | 7.67 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 51 |
1 | | | | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 17 | 15 | 8 | 7.53 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 46 |
| | | | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 15 | 8 | 7.89 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 48 |
4 | | 1 | | 7 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 6.04 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 46 |
| | | | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 7.93 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 44 |
1 | | | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 7.20 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 42 |
| 1 | | | 3 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 9 | 6.88 | 8 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 37 |
2 | | 1 | | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 9 | 7.11 | 8 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 44 |
| | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 36 | 9 | 8.48 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 53 |
3 | 5.66% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 53 |
7 | 13.21% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 53 |
33 | 62.26% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 298934 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 6 |
|---|
| Academic | 24 |
|---|
| School | 6 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 8 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 29 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 6 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 5 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2013 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 42 |
| | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 9 | 14 | 16 | 9 | 7.93 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 42 |
| 1 | | | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 14 | 8 | 7.74 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 42 |
| | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 8.00 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 38 |
2 | 2 | | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6.32 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 36 |
1 | | | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 9 | 7.86 | 9 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 36 |
1 | 1 | | | | | 4 | 6 | 5 | 19 | 9 | 7.72 | 9 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 35 |
1 | 1 | | | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 6.71 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 37 |
| 3 | 1 | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 9 | 7.49 | 9 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 37 |
3 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | | | 30 | 9 | 7.68 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 45 |
2 | 4.44% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 45 |
5 | 11.11% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 45 |
30 | 66.67% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 2163175 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 8 |
|---|
| Academic | 19 |
|---|
| School | 6 |
|---|
| Consortium | 1 |
|---|
| Special | 6 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 8 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 22 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 1 |
|---|
| 2012 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 39 |
| 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | 8 | 15 | 13 | 8 | 7.77 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 39 |
| | 1 | 1 | | | 4 | 7 | 9 | 17 | 9 | 7.77 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 36 |
1 | 1 | | | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 14 | 9 | 7.50 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 34 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 2 | 6 | 12 | 9 | 8 | 6.97 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 34 |
2 | | | | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 6.74 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 33 |
3 | 2 | | 1 | 1 | | | 3 | 6 | 17 | 9 | 7.00 | 9 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 35 |
2 | | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 30 | 9 | 8.37 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 40 |
2 | 5.00% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 40 |
5 | 12.50% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 40 |
26 | 65.00% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 287179 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 10 |
|---|
| Academic | 15 |
|---|
| School | 2 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 10 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 9 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 24 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2011 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 31 |
| | | | | 1 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 7.97 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 31 |
1 | | | | | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 7.61 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 26 |
1 | | | 1 | | 3 | | 4 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7.35 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 26 |
3 | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 6.62 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 24 |
1 | | 2 | | 1 | 5 | | 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6.42 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 24 |
3 | | | | | 4 | | 1 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 6.88 | 8 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 22 |
| | | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 2 | 17 | 9 | 8.41 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 31 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 31 |
5 | 16.13% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 31 |
20 | 64.52% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 114492 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 4 |
|---|
| Academic | 16 |
|---|
| School | 3 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 5 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 7 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 14 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 3 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2010 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 38 |
1 | | | | | | 3 | 9 | 7 | 18 | 9 | 7.87 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 32 |
2 | | | | | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 9 | 7.44 | 9 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 34 |
2 | | | | | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 16 | 9 | 7.38 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 34 |
2 | | | | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 9 | 7.44 | 9 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 34 |
2 | | | 2 | | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 20 | 9 | 7.56 | 9 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 34 |
| 1 | | | | | | 1 | 1 | 31 | 9 | 8.68 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 39 |
1 | 2.56% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 39 |
3 | 7.69% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 39 |
28 | 71.79% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 73783 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 15 |
|---|
| Academic | 12 |
|---|
| School | 5 |
|---|
| Consortium | 1 |
|---|
| Special | 3 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 5 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 20 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 5 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2009 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 26 |
| | | | | | 4 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 7.77 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 22 |
| | | | | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 7.82 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 23 |
| | | | | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 7.78 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 21 |
| | | | 1 | 8 | | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 6.95 | 7 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 21 |
1 | | | | | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 7.81 | 9 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 20 |
| | | | | | 1 | | | 19 | 9 | 8.85 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 27 |
1 | 3.70% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 27 |
1 | 3.70% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 27 |
17 | 62.96% |
|---|
| 2008 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Independent |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 7 |
| | | | | | | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7.86 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 7 |
| | | | | | | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 8.29 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 7 |
| | | | | | | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7.86 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 0 |
not applicable |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 7 |
| | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 8.43 | 9 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 7 |
| | | | | | | | 1 | 6 | 9 | 8.86 | 9 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 7 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 7 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 7 |
3 | 42.86% |
|---|
| 3 Responses for Koha -- Independent in 2007 |
2019 : gen: 8.06 company 7.46 loyalty 6.33 support 7.21
2018 : gen: 8.03 company 7.72 loyalty 7.71 support 7.63
2017 : gen: 7.66 company 7.67 loyalty 6.85 support 7.08
2016 : gen: 7.60 company 6.96 loyalty 6.24 support 6.63
2015 : gen: 7.89 company 7.47 loyalty 5.38 support 6.80
2014 : gen: 7.67 company 7.93 loyalty 7.11 support 7.20
2013 : gen: 7.93 company 7.86 loyalty 7.49 support 7.72
2012 : gen: 7.77 company 7.50 loyalty 7.00 support 6.97
2011 : gen: 7.97 company 7.35 loyalty 6.88 support 6.62
2010 : gen: 7.87 company 7.44 loyalty 7.56 support 7.38
2009 : gen: 7.77 company 7.82 loyalty 7.81 support 7.78
2008 : gen: 7.86 company 8.29 loyalty 8.43 support 7.86
Comments (survey2019)
Estamos terminando la etapa de normalización del archivo de autoridades en el Koha. Luego vamos a implementar el Repositorio para la documentación institucional en DSpace con la misma empresa Theke Solutions que creo que trabaja con ByWater Solutions.
(Library type: Government Agency; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 8)
Switching to open source was the best decision in our recorded automation history. Koha is a fantastic product that reduced our IT cost by 90%
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 9)
We don't use any company(ILS vendor), just our IT department support us.
(Library type: School; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)
We self-installed our system and rely on community support. We have had no issues that required support in the last year.
(Library type: Museum; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 8)
[...] Library self-host, so several of the questions I couldn't answer. Koha also only contains print material, other systems handle the electronic resources. So that questions wasn't answered either.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 9)
As stated in previous years, this survey is somewhat difficult to answer for us at [...] Library, since we only use Koha to manage physical materials. Everything else is managed by other systems, under our [...] Findit setup.
I've answered 0 for electronic materials again this year since we do not use Koha for this.
The number of our collection is the number of printed items. Not including electronic books and articles.
** When answering about vendor, we have a support contract with BibLibre, which we are happy with.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 8)
Kindly note our ILS (Koha) was initially installed by an external vendor company and henceforth has been supported by an in-house system administrator. All local development is shared with the Koha community.
(Library type: Theology; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 9)
We implemented migration from Clavius (LANius) to Koha basically on our own.
We are small municipal Library with 10 employees in total (1 IT), but we are helping with spreading this SW (helping with transition to others, translating to Czech, developing) of the Koha ILS itself.
Now there is in Czech Republic team of 5-6 evangelists which introduced Koha into other municipal libraries with 250+ implementations of Koha in total (from circa 6500 libraries in Czech Republic).
(Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)
Después de tres años en producción, confirmamos que Koha cubre las necesidades de una biblioteca universitaria. Tiene gran potencialidad y permite altos niveles de integración con otros sistemas.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: large; ils satisfaction: 8)
We have not used Koha's customer support as our school system won't pay for it.
(Library type: School; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 7)
We have been using Koha for almost 5 years and we have not encountered any problem. It is the best open-source ILS for us.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 7)
Suite à l'installation de Koha à la [...] , nous avons choisi de nous passer de prestataires. Nous travaillons avec un ingénieur développeur et une administratrice fonctionnelle dans l'équipe Koha à la [...]. Nous complétons avec des prestations externes ponctuelles de développement auprès de prestataires divers. Nous travaillons à faire entrer des fonctionnalités propres à notre structure et potentiellement utiles pour tous dans la branche communautaire de KOHA. Nous avons implémenté EDS Discovery service dans Koha via l'API d'EDS pour Koha. Merci et bonne journée,
(Library type: Academic; collection size: very large; ils satisfaction: 8)
We did not use any vendor for our implementation. We have local expertise and did everything on our own. We also actively contribute to Koha through the mailing list
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 9)
We did not use a company to migrate. We migrated in-house and support Koha ourselves.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)
Koha is having a positive momentum in Sweden today. Especially among public libraries where new consortia and joint ventures building on common Koha catalogne is emerging.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)
We don't have as yet a support contract. All issues having occurred to date were solved consulting the Koha manual or the community (mailing lists). Both are very helpful.
We definitely need a solution for our growing digital holdings (mostly e-books). That's why VuFind is under consideration -- meaning at this point, though, that is really only under consideration, no evaluation has taken place yet. This is an OPL and I'm yet busy with the migration from the old and awful ILS (which I'm very happy to have got rid of).
I'd like to mention and stress a point concerning Koha. I've worked with some ILS/discovery systems (most of all Aleph and Alma) that are shockingly expensive and inflexible and I can say that Koha - being open source and free - is none the worse for that. Au contraire: Koha is one of the best ILS available and I'm always amazed that our public university libraries spend so much tax money with systems that are by no means better than Koha.
Wishing you all the best for this year's survey!
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 9)
We have migrated from Kobli to KOHA
(Library type: Academic; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 7)
We have migrate the ILS from Virtua to KOHA since 2017, Currently we are using Koha version 16.05
(Library type: Academic; collection size: large; ils satisfaction: 7)
Though we don't have any vendor lock as Koha is a FOSS, however, sometimes it is considered as incomplete as it is not possible to implement all the modules as there are some functionalities that differ or vary to the local context. Moreover, we need to engage in R&D by ourselves for the betterment of the functional and operational processes. When we need any help, we communicate with the Koha technical forum or what other libraries has done. Thank you.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 7)
We are managing KOHA ILS with our own resources and set of expertise. However, we are considering now to get the support through an outsource organization. We have budgeted the cost and will decide upon its approval status.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 9)
Koha ILS is fully implemented by internal library staff. Migration from other library ILS solutions, training support etc are fully managed by the library staff of University of Calicut. We have implemented Vufind discovery system.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 8)
There is no problem of using ILS Koha. We ate very satisfied.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 9)
Our Library has implemented Koha on our own without any help from other companies.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 7)
We are satisfied with the current ILS.
(Library type: Academic; collection size: small; ils satisfaction: 7)