Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for UNILIB

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2019

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2018

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2017

Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2016 results according to the type and size of the library.

UNILIBallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS1 10000000
ILSFunctionality1 10000000
PrintFunctionality1 10000000
ElectronicFunctionality1 10000000
SatisfactionCustomerSupport1 10000000
CompanyLoyalty1 10000000


1 Responses for UNILIB in 2016

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2015

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2014

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2013

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2012

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2011

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2010

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2009

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2008

0 Responses for UNILIB in 2007

Comments

Although the ILS we currently use is robust and stable, it is not customizable almost at all and the public, as well as the librarians' interface is terribly outdated. The ILS has almost no support for digital materials but there is talks of development in that direction. The company has established partnership with Ebsco so they offer their version of a Discovery system through Ebsco-Unibis APIs. (Library type: Academic; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 2)

ILS