Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for None

4 Responses for None in 2017

Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2016 results according to the type and size of the library.

NoneallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS124.67 000114.820000
ILSFunctionality114.64 000104.500000
PrintFunctionality114.45 000104.400000
ElectronicFunctionality113.73 000103.600000
SatisfactionCustomerSupport105.00 00095.000000
CompanyLoyalty104.80 00094.780000



2016 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction12 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 94.675
ILS Functionality11 4 1 1 1 4 04.645
Print Functionality11 4 1 2 1 3 04.455
Electronic Functionality11 5 1 2 3 03.734
Company Satisfaction11 4 1 1 1 4 04.825
Support Satisfaction10 4 1 5 95.009
Support Improvement9 3 1 2 1 2 04.445
Company Loyalty10 3 1 2 1 3 04.805
Open Source Interest17 11 2 1 1 2 01.880

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS28 27.14%
Considering new Interface28 13.57%
System Installed on time?28 310.71%

Average Collection size: 6592

TypeCount
Public21
Academic2
School0
Consortium0
Special1

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00020
[2] 10,001-100,0004
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2015 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction6 2 2 1 1 03.504
ILS Functionality6 3 1 1 1 02.172
Print Functionality6 2 1 1 2 03.674
Electronic Functionality6 2 1 2 1 04.838
Company Satisfaction6 2 1 1 1 1 04.005
Support Satisfaction6 2 1 1 1 1 04.005
Support Improvement6 2 1 1 1 1 04.175
Company Loyalty6 2 2 1 1 03.674
Open Source Interest7 4 1 2 03.140

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS21 314.29%
Considering new Interface21 29.52%
System Installed on time?21 419.05%

Average Collection size: 8660

TypeCount
Public19
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00014
[2] 10,001-100,0006
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2014 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction8 2 1 2 3 95.888
ILS Functionality7 2 1 1 2 1 04.867
Print Functionality7 2 1 3 1 85.148
Electronic Functionality7 2 1 2 2 05.008
Company Satisfaction7 2 1 1 1 2 05.297
Support Satisfaction6 2 1 1 1 1 04.337
Support Improvement7 2 1 3 1 74.867
Company Loyalty6 1 3 2 87.178
Open Source Interest9 2 3 1 2 1 23.222

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS14 17.14%
Considering new Interface14 00.00%
System Installed on time?14 321.43%

Average Collection size: 2367847

TypeCount
Public13
Academic1
School0
Consortium0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0005
[2] 10,001-100,0008
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0011



2013 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction3 2 1 02.000
ILS Functionality2 1 1 03.006
Print Functionality2 1 1 03.006
Electronic Functionality2 1 1 01.503
Company Satisfaction1 1 44.004
Support Satisfaction1 1 44.004
Support Improvement1 1 99.009
Company Loyalty1 1 00.000
Open Source Interest2 2 00.000

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS14 00.00%
Considering new Interface14 00.00%
System Installed on time?14 17.14%

Average Collection size: 8621

TypeCount
Public14
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00010
[2] 10,001-100,0004
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2012 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction4 2 1 1 03.505
ILS Functionality4 2 1 1 03.505
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction4 2 1 1 03.505
Support Satisfaction4 2 1 1 03.505
Support Improvement3 1 1 1 04.675
Company Loyalty3 1 1 1 04.675
Open Source Interest3 2 1 03.000

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS14 00.00%
Considering new Interface14 00.00%
System Installed on time?14 214.29%

Average Collection size: 9995

TypeCount
Public12
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0009
[2] 10,001-100,0005
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2011 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction8 4 1 1 1 1 03.133
ILS Functionality8 4 1 1 1 1 03.133
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction8 4 2 1 1 03.385
Support Satisfaction8 4 2 1 1 03.385
Support Improvement8 3 4 1 53.635
Company Loyalty8 4 1 1 2 02.503
Open Source Interest12 7 1 2 2 03.420

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS21 314.29%
Considering new Interface21 00.00%
System Installed on time?21 29.52%

Average Collection size: 12024

TypeCount
Public20
Academic0
School0
Consortium1
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0009
[2] 10,001-100,00010
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2010 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction5 1 1 1 1 1 25.606
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction5 1 1 1 1 1 05.606
Support Satisfaction5 1 2 2 55.605
Support Improvement5 1 1 1 2 96.606
Company Loyalty5 1 1 1 2 96.208
Open Source Interest10 1 1 2 6 97.609

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS14 214.29%
Considering new Interface14 00.00%
System Installed on time?14 428.57%

Average Collection size: 9566

TypeCount
Public9
Academic1
School0
Consortium1
Special1

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0008
[2] 10,001-100,0004
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2009 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction8 1 2 2 1 1 1 14.135
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction7 2 2 1 1 1 04.435
Support Satisfaction6 2 1 2 1 04.337
Support Improvement6 2 1 1 1 1 04.175
Company Loyalty6 2 1 1 2 03.675
Open Source Interest11 4 1 1 5 95.187

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS24 520.83%
Considering new Interface24 14.17%
System Installed on time?24 416.67%





2008 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction7 4 2 1 03.000
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction7 4 1 2 03.290
Support Satisfaction7 4 1 1 1 02.570
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty7 4 1 2 02.860
Open Source Interest8 3 1 1 1 2 04.005

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS11 545.45%
Considering new Interface11 00.00%
System Installed on time?11 545.45%





2007 Survey Results
Product: None Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction1 1 00.000
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction1 1 00.000
Support Satisfaction1 1 00.000
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty1 1 00.000
Open Source Interest1 1 00.000

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS8 112.50%
Considering new Interface8 00.00%
System Installed on time?8 00.00%




2016 : gen: 4.67 company 4.82 loyalty 4.80 support 5.00

2015 : gen: 3.50 company 4.00 loyalty 3.67 support 4.00

2014 : gen: 5.88 company 5.29 loyalty 7.17 support 4.33

2013 : gen: 2.00 company 4.00 loyalty 0.00 support 4.00

2012 : gen: 3.50 company 3.50 loyalty 4.67 support 3.50

2011 : gen: 3.13 company 3.38 loyalty 2.50 support 3.38

2010 : gen: 5.60 company 5.60 loyalty 6.20 support 5.60

2009 : gen: 4.13 company 4.43 loyalty 3.67 support 4.33

2008 : gen: 3.00 company 3.29 loyalty 2.86 support 2.57

2007 : gen: 0.00 company 0.00 loyalty 0.00 support 0.00

Comments

We are a small, un-automated library open ten hours per week year-round, and have one paid employee. (Library type: Public; collection size: very small)

We do not have an automated system so questions were a moot point. (Library type: Public; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 0)

We have no automation system or discovery interface, so unfortunately, there is little useful information that I can provide (Library type: Other; collection size: very small)

We use Ebsco Discovery service instead of an ILS system. All students have access to it and most of our resources are listed on it. It serves as our catalog. The [...] is a distance learning institution and all of our courses are online. All resources are available online to students. (Library type: Academic; collection size: very small)

We are a library that serves a community of about 500 patrons and are open 2 hours daily Monday through Saturday (Library type: Public; collection size: very small)

No longer using a traditional ILS. We're an online-only library, so the discovery service has essentially replaced our ILS. (Library type: Medical; collection size: very small)

We don't have an ILS in place, everything we do is manual. (Library type: Public; collection size: very small)

[...] We do not have a public or professional collection and do not have an ILS. (Library type: State; collection size: very small)

[...] Public Library is not automated (Library type: Public; collection size: very small)

We are not automated. We are a small, rural library that serve 557 patrons. (Library type: Public; collection size: small)

We are not yet automated but would like to be if the money for that ever becomes available. (Library type: Public; collection size: very small; ils satisfaction: 0)

ILS