Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for CBL

0 Responses for CBL in 2018

0 Responses for CBL in 2017

Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2016 results according to the type and size of the library.

CBLallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS1 00000001
ILSFunctionality1 00000001
PrintFunctionality1 00000001
ElectronicFunctionality1 00000001
SatisfactionCustomerSupport1 00000001
CompanyLoyalty1 00000001


1 Responses for CBL in 2016

0 Responses for CBL in 2015

0 Responses for CBL in 2014

0 Responses for CBL in 2013

0 Responses for CBL in 2012

0 Responses for CBL in 2011

0 Responses for CBL in 2010

0 Responses for CBL in 2009

0 Responses for CBL in 2008

0 Responses for CBL in 2007

Comments

The system referred to is NOT an ILS but only an OPAC that collects data from various sources and interacts with others acting as a metaopac (Library type: Consortium; collection size: large; ils satisfaction: 8)

ILS