Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for Axiell Aurora

5 Responses for Axiell Aurora in 2018

0 Responses for Axiell Aurora in 2017

Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2016 results according to the type and size of the library.

Axiell AuroraallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS127.17 000117.181000
ILSFunctionality127.25 000117.271000
PrintFunctionality126.58 000116.821000
ElectronicFunctionality126.17 000116.181000
SatisfactionCustomerSupport126.75 000116.821000
CompanyLoyalty116.00 000106.201000



2016 Survey Results
Product: Axiell Aurora Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction12 1 8 3 77.177
ILS Functionality12 1 7 4 77.257
Print Functionality12 1 1 2 2 5 1 86.588
Electronic Functionality12 1 7 4 66.176
Company Satisfaction12 3 2 5 2 76.507
Support Satisfaction12 1 3 6 2 76.757
Support Improvement12 1 3 2 4 2 76.257
Company Loyalty11 2 1 4 3 1 66.006
Open Source Interest11 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 64.826

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS12 00.00%
Considering new Interface12 216.67%
System Installed on time?12 541.67%

Average Collection size: 118734

TypeCount
Public12
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0000
[2] 10,001-100,0006
[3] 100,001-250,0005
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2015 Survey Results
Product: Axiell Aurora Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction33 1 2 3 8 13 6 76.457
ILS Functionality33 1 5 4 10 11 2 86.947
Print Functionality33 1 1 3 5 13 10 76.767
Electronic Functionality31 1 2 1 4 8 2 10 2 1 75.525
Company Satisfaction33 1 3 3 7 6 11 2 75.676
Support Satisfaction33 3 2 7 8 13 75.796
Support Improvement33 1 4 9 9 8 2 55.736
Company Loyalty31 2 2 2 2 3 7 5 5 3 54.775
Open Source Interest32 1 3 3 1 2 6 4 4 5 3 55.286

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS35 25.71%
Considering new Interface35 12.86%
System Installed on time?35 1028.57%

Average Collection size: 180474

TypeCount
Public27
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special8

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0004
[2] 10,001-100,00015
[3] 100,001-250,0006
[4] 250,001-1,000,0003
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2014 Survey Results
Product: Axiell Aurora Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction15 2 1 3 6 3 76.477
ILS Functionality15 1 2 3 7 2 76.407
Print Functionality15 1 1 3 6 4 76.737
Electronic Functionality14 1 1 2 1 1 3 5 75.076
Company Satisfaction15 1 3 6 4 1 55.075
Support Satisfaction15 1 3 5 2 4 55.335
Support Improvement15 1 1 3 4 2 3 1 66.206
Company Loyalty15 1 3 3 4 2 2 43.674
Open Source Interest13 1 3 1 2 2 3 1 24.084

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS15 00.00%
Considering new Interface15 16.67%
System Installed on time?15 426.67%

Average Collection size: 150647

TypeCount
Public14
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special1

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0008
[3] 100,001-250,0004
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2013 Survey Results
Product: Axiell Aurora Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction32 3 8 3 4 14 75.566
ILS Functionality32 2 7 5 5 13 75.636
Print Functionality32 1 1 6 6 3 14 1 75.666
Electronic Functionality32 3 2 3 6 6 3 9 74.725
Company Satisfaction32 1 2 8 10 6 5 44.384
Support Satisfaction32 1 1 7 9 3 1 10 74.724
Support Improvement32 1 3 5 10 3 9 1 55.345
Company Loyalty31 1 1 6 5 7 1 5 5 44.064
Open Source Interest30 6 3 3 5 1 4 7 1 74.034

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS33 13.03%
Considering new Interface33 00.00%
System Installed on time?33 26.06%

Average Collection size: 114209

TypeCount
Public25
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special8

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0007
[2] 10,001-100,00012
[3] 100,001-250,0006
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2012 Survey Results
Product: Axiell Aurora Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction31 4 9 3 7 5 3 34.294
ILS Functionality31 2 4 5 4 6 8 2 64.295
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction31 1 2 6 10 5 4 3 33.293
Support Satisfaction31 1 4 5 6 5 9 1 64.294
Support Improvement30 1 4 3 9 9 4 55.105
Company Loyalty30 5 2 3 3 7 5 2 3 43.434
Open Source Interest30 5 2 3 2 1 7 6 2 1 1 54.005

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS32 13.13%
Considering new Interface32 00.00%
System Installed on time?32 412.50%

Average Collection size: 116575

TypeCount
Public25
Academic0
School0
Consortium0
Special7

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0005
[2] 10,001-100,00012
[3] 100,001-250,0004
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010


1 Responses for Axiell Aurora in 2011

1 Responses for Axiell Aurora in 2010

0 Responses for Axiell Aurora in 2009

0 Responses for Axiell Aurora in 2008

0 Responses for Axiell Aurora in 2007

2016 : gen: 7.17 company 6.50 loyalty 6.00 support 6.75

2015 : gen: 6.45 company 5.67 loyalty 4.77 support 5.79

2014 : gen: 6.47 company 5.07 loyalty 3.67 support 5.33

2013 : gen: 5.56 company 4.38 loyalty 4.06 support 4.72

2012 : gen: 4.29 company 3.29 loyalty 3.43 support 4.29

Comments

Some troubleshooting goes through consortium (ie. things that affect everybody) and some we make ourselves (ie. things that affect everybody, but only one library needs, like mass change off addresses). (Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 8)

Axiell's Aurora works now fine. Coming is new version without Silverlight and Java. Using html 5. Competition is hard and libraries are poor... (Library type: Public; collection size: medium; ils satisfaction: 7)

ILS